Legal Opinion
DiMaggio v. Cannon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 2, 1973PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiff and the defendant are brother and sister and are owners of adjoining tracts of land situated in the city of New London. Prior to 1939, the parents of the parties held title to both parcels as one tract of land. In 1939, the parents deeded to the plaintiff the easterly portion of the tract with a forty-five-foot frontage on the city street. At the time the plaintiff received his deed in 1939, there existed an old fieldstone wall about three feet wide on the easterly boundary of his land. In 1940, the plaintiff built a foundation for his home with some stones from the stone wall.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Keyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Housing Authority v. DorseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Putnam, Coffin & Burr, Inc. v. HalpernSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Mentz v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Favorite v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Pinsky v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Morris v. CostaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Royce v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.