Legal Opinion
Mentz v. Town of Greenwich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 6, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to quiet and settle the title to two adjoining tracts of land in Greenwich which are described in the complaint, the first tract being upland and the second tract a small triangular piece of lowland or beach lying between the first tract and tidal water. The defendant in its answer disclaimed any interest or estate in the first tract and in a small portion of the second tract, but denied that the plaintiff was the owner in fee simple of the remainder of the second tract, claimed that this was a portion of a public dock- and landing place by immemorial usage…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lentine v. McAvoySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Foote v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Borden v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Merwin v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Turgeon v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hoffman v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Loewenberg v. WallaceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Horowitz v. F. E. Spencer Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
- Lake Garda Improvement Assn. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- DeVita v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.