Legal Opinion

Leishman v. Goodlett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 4, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Judge.

The question is whether fraudulent and dishonest acts of a real estate broker or salesman not done in his capacity as a broker or salesman authorize imposition of liability upon the real estate education, research and recovery fund pursuant to KRS 324.400-324.420.

Appellant Leishman is a licensed real estate salesman. On February 1, 1977, he met with appellee whom he had known for approximately five years and solicited a loan from her in the amount of $10,000.00 to be used by him for the completion of a house which he was then constructing. Ap-pellee was led to believe that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sims v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sheppard v. Bay Country Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Allard v. Kentucky Real Estate CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992
  4. Kentucky Real Estate Commission v. MilgromCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API