Cobb v. Follansbee
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Before the executrix elected to testify, and subject to exception, the appellants were permitted to testify as stated in the opinion. After such election they were permitted to testify generally. Transferred from the January term, 1918, of the superior court by Marble, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.
There are in this case a large number of exceptions to the admission of evidence. Many of these relate to testimony tending to show the relations of the various parties, their feelings, purposes and actions. Many others relate to the state of mind of the decedent, to the rationality, or otherwise, of her views, to influence exerted over her, to fraud practised upon her, and to a plan to deceive the heirs as to the extent of her property and the terms of the will she had made. The issues tried being the sanity of the testatrix and fraud or undue influence in procuring the execution of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
- Sharp v. SharpMontana Supreme Court · 1943
- State v. HaleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1932
- State v. TravisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.