State v. Travis
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.
“This presents the'ordinary case of evidence admissible for one purpose, but not for another.” Cobb v. Follansbee, 79 N. H. 205, 210.
The law is fundamental that the state cannot offer evidence of the bad character of a defendant except to rebut his evidence of good character (State v. Lapage, 57 N. H. 245, 289, 290), and even then bad character cannot be shown by particular acts. State v. Palmer, 65 N. H. 216, 218. It is also true that proof that a defendant has previously committed an offense similar to that for which he is on trial is not evidence that he is guilty of the offense charged.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. LapageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876
- Tuttle v. DodgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- State v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902
- Gutterson v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1877
- State v. FoggSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doyle v. LacroixSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- State v. Wayne KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. Wayne KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980