Legal Opinion
Bank of Manhattan Trust Co. v. Twenty-one Sixty-six Broadway Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.
These appeals may be decided together, despite technical features present in one and absent in the other. Two orders are here for review. One of them grants a motion made by the receiver, appointed in this foreclosure suit, and authorizes him to collect rent from appellants Emett and O’Gar a and maintain suit therefor against them; the other grants the receiver’s motion to fix the rental to be paid by appellant The Corporation of the Manhattan Congregational Church. The mortgage was executed by the defendant church (the owner of the fee) and by defendant Twenty-one Sixty-six Broadway…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Prudence Co. v. 160 West Seventy-Third Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Prudence Co. v. 160 West Seventy-third Street Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jamaica Savings Bank v. Florizal Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- New York City Community Preservation Corp. v. Michelin AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- 3105 Grand Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- East New York Savings Bank v. 520 West 50th St. Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.