Legal Opinion

3105 Grand Corp. v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

It will suffice to state our conclusions without elaborate detail of the facts which evoke them.

The action is in equity to recover certain moneys taken from receivership funds, beneficially owned by the plaintiffs and others similarly situated, to pay taxes on property in another receivership, which payments have operated to the unjust enrichment of the defendant 92-21 Union Hall Street, Inc. After joinder of issue plaintiffs moved for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, striking out the answers of defendants. The judgment appealed from grants plaintiffs’ motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Bank of Manhattan Trust Co. v. Twenty-one Sixty-six Broadway Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wembach Corp. v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. 3105 Grand Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  3. 3105 Grand Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API