Legal Opinion
Jamaica Savings Bank v. Florizal Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 1978PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Hyman, J.
In this mortgage foreclosure action, the Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company has moved for a "judgment determining that it may not be held liable to Jamaica Savings Bank on its bond issued by it as Surety for the Receiver” or, in the alternative, for an "order permitting it to enter judgment against the Receiver for the amount of the judgment entered against it by Jamaica Savings Bank, plus costs and attorney’s fees.”
The basic facts upon which this motion is based are as follows:
One, Orenstein commenced a foreclosure of a second mortgage on the premises…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Decker v. . GardnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Rumsey Electric Co. v. University of DelawareSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- O'Mahoney v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Rumsey Electric Co. v. University of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1975
- French v. . DauchyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ripple's of Clearview, Inc. v. Le Havre AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Litho Fund Equities, Inc. v. Alley Spring Apartments Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bank of Tokyo Trust Co. v. Urban Food Malls Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Spark Tarrytown, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.