Legal Opinion

Edens v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 14, 1986No. 0680PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gardner, Judge:

Farm Bureau insured Edens’ house for $70,000 and the contents thereof for $35,000. A total loss by fire occurred October 4, 1974, precipitating this suit. Farm Bureau contended the policy had been cancelled. From an adverse jury verdict on January 25,1980, Edens appealed to the Supreme Court, which held (1) that the house was valued at $70,000 and the contents $35,000 and (2) that a directed verdict should have been awarded Edens; the case was remanded for entry of judgment pursuant to the decision. Farm Bureau then paid Edens $105,000; the parties held open Edens’ claim for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. AMER. MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO. OF CHARLESTONSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Flynn v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Edens v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. M. B. A. F. B. Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Babb v. RothrockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Poston v. National Fidelity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SimmondsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Spinx Oil Co. v. Federated Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Vance v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API