Legal Opinion

City of Wilmington v. Lord

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 21, 1977PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNEILLY, Justice.

Defendant, City of Wilmington, appeals from the granting of a permanent injunction by the Court of Chancery prohibiting the City from building a water tank on land conveyed to the City for use as a public park. The appeal represents the culmination of a continuing battle between plaintiffs, suing in their capacity as citizens and taxpayers, attempting to stop what they consider to be a misuse of public property, and the City of Wilmington attempting to construct what it sees as a conforming use on park land. There being no dispute as to the material facts the Court below…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Paepcke v. Public Building CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Codman v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. Chavin v. H. H. Rosin & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  4. Hyland v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Haddock v. Board of Public EducationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Eastern Missouri Laborers District Council v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. West Farms Mall, LLC v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. White v. Metropolitan Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Reeder v. WagnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  5. Manchester v. RzewnickiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API