Legal Opinion

Chautauque County Bank v. . Risley

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1859PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] One Saxton, who is the common source of title, on the 1st of October, 1837, assigned all his real estate to Crosby and Crane for the benefit of his creditors. Webb and Douglass afterwards, on the 4th of November, 1837, recovered a judgment against him, which was the first in the order of time. On the 28th of September, 1838, having had their execution returned unsatisfied, they filed their bill in Chancery against the assignor and assignees for the purpose of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  2. New York Firemen Insurance v. SturgesNew York Supreme Court · 1824
  3. President of the Chautauque County Bank v. RisleyNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Jackson ex dem. Lansing v. LawNew York Supreme Court · 1825

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Smith v. . ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Copeland v. SalomonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. National Tradesmen's Bank v. WetmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API