Legal Opinion
Clifford M. Curtis v. Campbell-Taggart, Inc., Rainbow Baking Company of Oklahoma City, Rainbow Baking Company of Tulsa and Mead Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1982No. 81-1736PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Clifford M. Curtis seeks to recover damages from defendants for alleged anti-trust violations. Three theories of recovery are alleged: first, that defendants in the late 1960’s conspired to force plaintiff out of the baking business; second, that in 1977 defendants forced the closure of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Robert H. Martin v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Air Courier Conference of America v. American Postal Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sports Racing Services, Inc. v. Sports Car Club of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Ashley Creek Phosphate Co. v. Chevron USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.