Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Vaughn

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1961No. L. A. No. 25847PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

— The city of Los Angeles brought this action to recover a sum alleged to be due and owing by defendant as a business license tax for the years 1956, 1957 and 1958.

Defendant is one of a group of official reporters of the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles upon whom such tax was sought to be imposed by the city under section 21.190 (subd. a) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code.1

*200Defendant filed a general demurrer to the complaint, which demurrer was overruled. Defendant did not answer and permitted judgment to be taken against him, from which he appeals.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. California Employment Commission v. Los Angeles Down Town Shopping News Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Summers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Williams v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Nichols v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Housewright v. Pacific Far East Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API