Legal Opinion

Santiago v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 2000No. C7-00-307PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *

A jury convicted appellant and a code-fendant each of one count of second-degree murder and two counts of attempted second-degree murder. In this postconviction proceeding, appellant seeks a new trial claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) joining the codefendants for trial; (2) not admitting certain evidence; and (3) allowing attorney misconduct to occur during attorney arguments. In the alternative to seeking a new trial, appellant challenges the trial court’s imposition of a consecutive sentence. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Edward Santiago…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  4. State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API