Santiago v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *
A jury convicted appellant and a code-fendant each of one count of second-degree murder and two counts of attempted second-degree murder. In this postconviction proceeding, appellant seeks a new trial claiming that the trial court abused its discretion in (1) joining the codefendants for trial; (2) not admitting certain evidence; and (3) allowing attorney misconduct to occur during attorney arguments. In the alternative to seeking a new trial, appellant challenges the trial court’s imposition of a consecutive sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Edward Santiago…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. SalitrosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. GreenleafSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Santiago v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002