Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
RUSSELL E. SMITH, Chief Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I find:
I
This action is brought to recover damages under the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act (49 U.S.C. § 20(11)). Jurisdiction is conferred on this court by 28 U.S.C. § 1337.
II
Defendant is a motor common carrier engaged in the business of transporting household goods for hire in interstate commerce, providing service to the shipping public between points including Des Moines, Iowa, and Great Falls, Montana. Plaintiff is a resident of Great Falls, Montana.
III. •
The plaintiff delivered a quantity of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Midstate Horticultural Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. LeatherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- John Morrell & Company v. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- L.M. Kirkpatrick Co. v. I.C.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Eisman v. Pan American World AirlinesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- William A. Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Quasar Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Westhemeco Ltd. v. New Hampshire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- FIREMAN'S FUND INS. COMPANIES v. Barnes Elec., Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.