Legal Opinion
Quasar Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 31, 1986No. 83 C 4617PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
It all started with what looked like a simple discovery request. Plaintiff Quasar Company (Quasar) wanted documents and answers to interrogatories which would relate to the degree of defendant Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway’s (Santa Fe’s) negligence in the theft of a shipment of Quasar’s video cassette recorders from a Santa Fe yard. This court granted Quasar’s motion to compel. Quasar Co. v. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., No. 83 C 4617 (N.D.Ill. July 30, 1985) [Available on WESTLAW, DCTU database]. Santa Fe rapidly returned asking…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Thomas Deiro v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- American Cyanamid Company v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- KEMPER INS. COMPANIES v. Federal Exp. Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Cutler v. 65 Security PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.