Legal Opinion

William A. Cordingley v. Allied Van Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 25, 1977No. 76-3466PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:

Allied Van Lines (Allied), a common carrier, appeals from a district court judgment awarding damages for household goods destroyed in shipment.

The court below held that appellee’s claim for damages was not time-barred under the terms of the bill of lading.1 The holding was based on the court’s conclusion that, “in light of the totality of its conduct,” Allied could not be said to have given the plaintiff notice of disallowance of his claim. Without such notice, the bill of lading’s limitations period could not begin to run and the suit on the claim could not be…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Quasar Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. Laborers Health And Welfare Trust Fund For Northern California v. Kaufman & Broad Of Northern California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Viacom International, Inc. v. Lorimar Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  4. Westhemeco Ltd. v. New Hampshire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
  5. Barcelona v. Fox Grocery Co. Employees' Pension PlanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API