Macon Railway & Light Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Bibb superior court—Judge Mathews. August 14, 1916.
1Opinion of the CourtIjUKE, J.
1. There being in the charge of the court a very full and detailed statement of the plaintiff’s contentions, including in substance the allegations of the petition and of the amendment thereto, without mention of any contention of the defendant, or of the defendant’s denial of contentions or allegations of the plaintiff, and without any reference to the defendant’s pleading, and the ease being a close one under the evidence, the trial judge should have granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial, in which this was complained of. Seaboard Air-Line Ry. v. Sikes, 4 Ga. App. 7 (6), 12 (60 S.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Millen & Southwestern Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Atlanta Consolidated Street Rwy. Co. v. HardageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Phinizy v. BushSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. SikesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Brown & Franklin v. Everett Ridley Ragan Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- F. N. Roberts Corp. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Kibbey Chevrolet, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965