Legal Opinion

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Sikes

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 16, 1908No. 766PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Action for damages, from city court of Reidsville — Judge Morgan. August 31, 1907.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

Sikes and others brought suit against the Seaboard Air-Line Railway to recover damages resulting to them from the erection of a bridge across the Canoochee river. They allege that the Canoochee river is a navigable stream which the public has the right to use as a highway, and that the river has been in fact used by the public for the purpose of drifting and floating lumber, timber, and logs to market so long that “the memory of man runneth not to the contrary;” and they assert that the public has 'therefore acquired a right by prescription to such use of the river. The Seaboard Air-Line…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  2. Rouse v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Brooks v. Cedar Brook & Swift Cambridge River Improvement Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Mayor of Savannah v. BarnesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  3. Black v. New Holland Baptist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Givens v. Ichauway, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  5. Strozzo v. Coffee Bluff Marina PropertyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API