Legal Opinion

Lustgarten v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-3481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

This is an action for professional malpractice. Plaintiffs Paul and Jacqueline Lustgarten, faced with the distressing prospect of owing the Government a sizeable sum of money in the way of a deficiency in their federal income tax return for 1971, seek to recover money damages. They allege that their predicament results from the negligence of the various defendants in rendering tax advice in connection with an ill-fated stock sale transaction. Defendants have moved to dismiss.

I

The allegations embodied in the complaint — allegations assumed to be true…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. Latrobe Die Castingcompany, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Avins v. MollDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Sherman Industries, Inc. v. GoldhammerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API