Sherman Industries, Inc. v. Goldhammer
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This is a legal malpractice case arising out of unsuccessful patent litigation which exposed plaintiff to liability in excess of one million dollars. Plaintiff, Sherman Industries, Inc. (“Sherman”), a manufacturer of carwash equipment, is suing its former lawyer, Joel S. Goldhammer, Esq., and the law firm Seidel, Gonda & Goldhammer, P.C. (jointly referred to herein as “Gold-hammer”). The essence of plaintiff’s case is that defendants undertook to investigate a potential patent infringement and to ad vise plaintiff how to minimize the risks involved in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Kapil v. Association of Pennsylvania State College & University FacultiesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Ross v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Garcia v. Community Legal Services Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- American International Adjustment Co. v. Frank J. Galvin, Jr., and Galvin, Stalmack and KirschnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Coregis Insurance Company v. Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq. Kenneth Lee Danielle Lee Baratta & Fenerty, Ltd Anthony Baratta, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.