Douglas-Bey v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Associate Judge:
Douglas-Bey contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence (and testimony relating thereto) which was seized from his apartment and that as a result, his conviction for felony murder and related offenses must be reversed. We agree and reverse.1
*1138Officer Hennessy monitored a police radio broadcast reporting a shooting at 711 Irving Street, N.E. Hennessy was quite nearby and proceeded to that location. At that address was a four unit apartment building. Hennessy entered and while in the second floor public hallway, he observed one…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Earle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Hicks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Prince Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.