Legal Opinion

Douglas-Bey v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1985No. 83-407PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Associate Judge:

Douglas-Bey contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress physical evidence (and testimony relating thereto) which was seized from his apartment and that as a result, his conviction for felony murder and related offenses must be reversed. We agree and reverse.1

*1138Officer Hennessy monitored a police radio broadcast reporting a shooting at 711 Irving Street, N.E. Hennessy was quite nearby and proceeded to that location. At that address was a four unit apartment building. Hennessy entered and while in the second floor public hallway, he observed one…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Earle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Hicks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Prince Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Settles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API