Legal Opinion

Hayes v. A.J. Associates, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1993No. S-4837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

A lessee of mining rights on filled tidelands staked a claim to the mineral estate when he learned of a reservation of the mineral rights to the state in the patent. The lessor/surface owner sought ejectment. The lessee, alleging fraud, counterclaimed to recover the royalties paid under the lease. The superior court granted summary judgment for the lessor on the ground that the state did not reserve the minerals in the fill material. This court reversed, concluding that the state reserved the mineral rights to minerals in the fill material, and remanded for further…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Marks v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. City of Berkeley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wassink v. HawkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hayes v. A.J. Associates, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Hayes v. A.J. Associates, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API