Legal Opinion

State, Department of Natural Resources v. Alaska Riverways, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 2010No. S-13249, S-13269PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We are called upon today to decide whether the State of Alaska has the authority to require private parties who construct wharves into adjacent navigable waters to enter into leases. The answer to this question depends on whether the common law right to construct a wharf in front of one’s property, which was recognized in territorial days, has given way to the right of the state to require a lease on behalf of all Alaskans for the exclusive use of state-owned land.

We conclude that the Alaska Constitution and the Alaska Land Act have modified the common-law…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Yates v. MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Maher Terminals, LLC v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Kanuk Ex Rel. Kanuk v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State, Dept. of Public Safety v. Doe IAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. McCavit v. LacherAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API