Brooks v. Range Motor Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
These two cases were tried together in the law court. Each originated in a justice's court. The Range Motor Company brought its action against C.S. Brooks to collect a deficiency balance of $171.45 on a conditional sale contract, and Brooks sued the Range Motor Company for damages of $201 for the conversion of said automobile by the motor company, in that it did not advertise and sell the same within ten days after repossession for purpose of sale, as required by conditional sale statutes. Both suits were tried by the same justice; Brooks' suit was dismissed, and judgment was rendered against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Ice & Coal Co. v. AlleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Murray v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Russell v. Clinton Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1922
- Fry v. ShipleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Lieberman v. PuckettTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quick v. Woodward Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Tedesco v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1958
- Carl v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964