Inge v. Walker
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
SAM BIRD, Judge.
Margaret Inge appeals the granting of summary judgment in favor of Scott Walker. She argues that there were questions of fact to be determined and, therefore, Walker should not have been awarded summary judgment. We agree with Inge that there were issues of fact to be determined and that the grant of summary judgment was error. Consequently, we reverse and remand.
The case arises out of an automobile accident that took place on June 15, 1998. Ms. Inge was stopped in the street waiting to make a left turn. Walker was behind her and bumped her rear bumper. They moved their cars…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wallace v. BroylesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Milam v. Bank of CabotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Wyatt v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McWilliams v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Cranfill v. Union Planters Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Burnett v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Tackett v. Merchant's Security PatrolCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Holytrent Properties, Inc. v. Valley Park Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.