Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rappaport-Scott v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 2007No. B184917PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, Acting P. J.

Laura Rappaport-Scott appeals a judgment dismissing her complaint against her automobile insurer, Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club (Interinsurance), after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. She contends Interinsurance unreasonably and in bad faith refused her demand to settle her claim for benefits for bodily injury caused by an underinsured motorist before submitting the claim to arbitration. We conclude that the facts alleged in the complaint are insufficient to state a cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Brehm v. 21st Century InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Gentry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  4. Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. v. Xl Specialty Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. Keshish v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API