State v. Meneses
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 — Andre Toi Meneses appeals his numerous convictions for telephone harassment and witness intimidation. A jury convicted Meneses after he repeatedly phoned Jamila Willis to curse at her, threaten her, and otherwise intimidate her. Meneses argues that the trial court omitted an essential mens rea element in its instructions to the jury, that his convictions for both telephone harassment and intimidating a witness arising from the same phone call violated double jeopardy, and that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of witness tampering. We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State Of Washington, Resp-cross v. Danny Giles, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. HunleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State Of Washington v. Abdullahi Khalif NoorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State Of Washington v. Joel Edward PayneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.