State v. Brown
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
Two questions are raised: (1) Is sec. 161.02 (3), Stats., unconstitutional, and (2) is there sufficient credible evidence to sustain the conviction ?
The defendant contends sec. 161.02 (3), Stats., makes the excessive or the habitual use of narcotics a crime, while in fact such use is a disease and the criminal sanctions amount to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the state and federal constitutions. The defendant relies on Robinson v. California (1962), 370 U. S. 660, 82 Sup. Ct. 1417, 8 L. Ed. 758. After the printing of the defendant’s brief, the same question was presented to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Browne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Barnes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
3Cited by17 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Phillips v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Warrix v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Edwards v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.