Legal Opinion

Barnes v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1964PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.

The writ of error presents the issue of whether it was prejudicial error for the trial court to have denied the motion to suppress the evidence. To resolve this issue the court must resolve these subsidiary questions:(1) Was the consent by defendant to the search of his person voluntary and not the product of duress ?(2) If such consent was the product of duress, did it constitute an unconstitutional search ?

The provision of sec. 11, art I, Wis. Const.,1 is identical to that of the Fourth amendment, United States constitution. This court long prior to Mapp v. Ohio (1961), 367 U. S. 643, 81…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Eduardo Amador-Gonzalez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. PierceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. United States v. Willie Robinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API