Morr v. Merkle
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this proceeding in error a reversal of the judgment is sought upon two grounds: First, that the judgment is not sustained by the evidence, and, second, that there was error in the charge of the court.
This court is of the opinion that the first ground is not well founded, and may be dismissed without further comment.
The court charged the jury as follows:
“Now as further applicable to this case I also direct the jury’s attention to §12603-1 GO, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows:
‘Whoever operates a motor vehicle on the public roads or highways without due regard for the safety…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Heidle v. BaldwinOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Jones v. HarmonOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Souder v. Hassenfeldt, Admx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. SkinnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- Bossert v. LouysOhio Court of Appeals · 1933
- Lazzara v. HartOhio Court of Appeals · 1933