Legal Opinion
Bossert v. Louys
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 1933No. 2812Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By LLOYD, J.
The evidence we find is so in conflict that a verdict, whether for Louys or Bossert, would not be disturbed as manifestly against the weight of the' evidence. None of the ordinance pleaded by Louys in his amended petition was introduced in evidence, except the portion thereof quoted therein. As to the ordinance, the court instructed the jury as follows:
“It is provided by ordinance of the City of Toledo, which the parties have admitted was in full force and effect at the time of the occurrence in question, as follows: Reckless driving within the meaning of this ordinance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McKinnon v. PettiboneOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- Morr v. MerkleOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- Lazzara v. HartOhio Court of Appeals · 1933