United States v. Shriver
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MOODY, District Judge.
On September 26, 1991, defendants-ap-pellees were indicted under certain provisions of the wiretap laws,2 specifically 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2512(l)(a) and (b), and Section 705(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 605(a), for conspiring to manufacture, sell and assist others in the use of electronic devices commonly known as “modified descramblers”.3 On December 19, 1991, the government, plaintiff-appellant, obtained a superseding indictment against defendants, containing substantially the same charges as those contained in the original…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. William MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Trustees of Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust v. Allied Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jeffrey Richard PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re SchnabelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Hunter v. Society Bank & Trust (In Re Parker Steel Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
- United States v. Charles Leslie HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. One MacOm Video Cipher Ii, Sn A6j050073, Anthony E. Goldberg, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Stephen L. Shriver, Joseph R. Denman, Harry Lawrence Daly, and Joseph D. FonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992