Legal Opinion

United States v. Shriver

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 23, 1992No. 92-1510PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOODY, District Judge.

On September 26, 1991, defendants-ap-pellees were indicted under certain provisions of the wiretap laws,2 specifically 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1), 18 U.S.C. § 2512(l)(a) and (b), and Section 705(a) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 605(a), for conspiring to manufacture, sell and assist others in the use of electronic devices commonly known as “modified descramblers”.3 On December 19, 1991, the government, plaintiff-appellant, obtained a superseding indictment against defendants, containing substantially the same charges as those contained in the original…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. William MontoyaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Trustees of Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust v. Allied Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Jeffrey Richard PowellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re SchnabelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  2. Hunter v. Society Bank & Trust (In Re Parker Steel Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
  3. United States v. Charles Leslie HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. One MacOm Video Cipher Ii, Sn A6j050073, Anthony E. Goldberg, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Stephen L. Shriver, Joseph R. Denman, Harry Lawrence Daly, and Joseph D. FonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API