Legal Opinion
United States v. One MacOm Video Cipher Ii, Sn A6j050073, Anthony E. Goldberg, Claimant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1993No. 91-4146PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge.
The United States of America (“government”) filed a forfeiture action under 18 U.S.C. § 2513 (1988) against certain electronic devices which were used, sent, carried, manufactured, assembled, possessed, sold, or advertised in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (“ECPA”), specifically 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 and 2512. The district court granted claimant-appellee’s, Anthony E. Goldberg’s, motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the district court’s order is REVERSED.
FACTS
On August 31,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Duane Dale DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Jack LandeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. McNuttCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee BellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- DIRECTV Inc. v. PepeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- DirecTV, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2004
- United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee BellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of the Application of the State of NewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.