Legal Opinion

Bosnick v. Hill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 22, 1987No. 86-292PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case involves a warranty deed of conveyance and raises one issue: Is the grantee-covenantee entitled to recover his costs and expenses from his grantorcovenantor when the covenantee successfully defends or asserts his title against a third party’s claim of adverse possession? We conclude he is so entitled and reverse the chancellor’s holding to the contrary.

Appellees, George and Verna Metzler, conveyed by general warranty deed certain acreage to appellants, Larry and Sharon Bosnick. Upon the Bosnicks’ attempt to clear some of their newly-acquired acreage, the Bosnicks…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smiley v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  2. Seldon v. Dudley E. Jones Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Collier v. CowgerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
  4. Dillahunty v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  5. Belleville Land & Lumber Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Murchie v. HintonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Riddle v. UdoujSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Turner v. EubanksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Riddle v. UdoujCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API