Legal Opinion

Riddle v. Udouj

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 2007No. CA 06-865PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John B. Robbins, Judge.

The Sebastian County Circuit Court dismissed appellants’ claims for breach of warranty and constructive fraud on the ground that they were barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

In 1996, appellants Julia and Joseph Riddle purchased a residential lot from appellees Michael and Richard Udouj, trustees of the Olivia Udouj Trust. A survey showed two fences on the lot, one running along and just inside the northern border and the other running along and just inside the eastern border. The deed conveyed property on both sides of the fences. Appellees warranted that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chalmers v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Ward v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Wilson v. General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Hampton v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Scollard v. ScollardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riddle v. UdoujSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Riddle v. UdoujCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API