Legal Opinion

De Vol v. Citizens' Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

There was evidence offered to the jury for its consideration that the plaintiff was the owner of the lots in question and that he deposited $1,000 with the bank under the terms of his alleged contract, so we need not be further concerned with that phase of the case. The more serious question that confronts us is: Did the plaintiff perform the contract as alleged in his complaint? If there was any evidence to support this contention, it was a question of fact to be submitted to the jury; but if no evidence was offered relative to that issue, it then became a question of law for the court to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Alerding v. AllisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. McGregor v. Oregon R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Young v. StickneyOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hoffman v. HabighorstOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Pacific Mill Co. v. InmanOregon Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Mathis v. Thunderbird Village, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Weed v. Idaho Copper Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  4. McKeon v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. McKeon v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API