Legal Opinion

Doctor v. State

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 31, 2005No. 2004-78-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The applicant, Alexis Doctor, appeals from the Superior Court’s denial of his application for postconviction relief. This case came before the Court for oral argument on December 1, 2004, pursuant to an order directing all parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After considering the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the case should be decided at this time. For the reasons stated below, we deny the appeal and affirm the…

3Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. HenshawSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  4. State v. DameSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  5. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mattatall v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  2. Larngar v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  3. Gonder v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Bryant v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  5. Javier Merida v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API