Legal Opinion

California Veterinary Medical Ass'n v. City of West Hollywood

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 2007No. B188723Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLUSS, P. J.

Echoing Gandhi’s teaching that a society’s moral progress is best judged by its treatment of animals, 1 the City of West Hollywood has banned as cruel and inhumane the practice of animal declawing unless necessary for a therapeutic purpose. Believing West Hollywood’s prohibition of recognized veterinary medical procedures within its city limits was both inappropriate and ill advised, the California Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) filed an action for declaratory and injunctive relief, asserting the ordinance was preempted by the California Veterinary Medical Practice…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Intel Corp. v. HamidiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API