Legal Opinion
Billy Russell Clark v. Tim Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 2003No. 00-16727PublishedCited by 352 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge STAPLETON.
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion and concurrence filed on January, 23, 2003, and appearing at 317 F.3d 1038 (9th Cir.2003), are amended. The amended opinion and concurrence are filed herewith.
The panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge O’Scannlain has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Stapleton and Judge Fernandez so recommended.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc.…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by352 opinions
- Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James BlodgettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Robert Murray v. Dora SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Moses v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Anton E. Barker v. Gary FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
347 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.