Hearn v. Leary
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Herrick, J.:
This motion is made under rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice for judgment on the pleadings, it being the contention of the defendants that the amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Under this rule the motion must be determined solely upon the pleadings. (Welch v. City of Niagara Falls, 210 App. Div. 170.) The court is not called upon to decide whether the plaintiff will ultimately succeed on the trial on a motion of this character, but must take the plaintiff’s story of his grievance as alleged in his pleading and taking the facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. Musical Mutual Protective UnionNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- City of Syracuse v. . HoganNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Cass v. . HigenbotamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Welch v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Moore v. Bonbright & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Herrmann v. SeiderNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Rosenblum v. Warren-Nash Motor Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1928
- Tavitoff v. StepovichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Unger v. WeisnerNew York Supreme Court · 1927