Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bonbright & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 21, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, J.:

The action was commenced February 28,1921, and the defendants demurred to the amended complaint on January 25, 1922, upon the grounds: (1) That it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a. cause of action; (2) that causes of action were improperly united.

The order granting the defendants’ motion for judgment upon the pleadings is dated April 10,1922. It does not recite the grounds upon which demurrer is sustained nor are we favored by any opinion or memorandum by the learned justice at Special Term. As the order and judgment dismiss the complaint upon the merits without leave…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. De Ronde v. BellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cavanagh v. HutchesonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hurwitz v. HurwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Krieger v. Popular Publications, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Brill v. WagnerNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Port v. HolzingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API