Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Watson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 10, 1997No. 93DR0106; CA A91904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Husband moved for a modification of his child support obligation when one of his children reached the age of 21. The trial court denied the motion on the ground that the original dissolution judgment contains a stipulation that obligates husband to pay “family support” that, although containing a portion expressly allocated to “child support,” continues even after the children obtain the age of majority. We conclude that the trial court erred in its construction of the original dissolution judgment and accordingly reverse and remand for entry of a judgment modifying the child support award.

At…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In re the Marriage of EidlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. PorterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. In re the Marriage of HearnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. In re the Marriage of RossiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of CofskyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Rempel v. United Parcel Service General Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API