Alpha Pro Tech, Inc. v. VWR International LLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
PRATTER, District Judge.
VWR International LLC (‘VWR”) moves to dismiss (Docket No. 29) Alpha Pro Tech, Inc.’s (“APT”) Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” Docket No. 28). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
As APT alleges in its Second Amended Complaint, “this action is about two things: VWR improperly obtained [APT’s] trade secrets while in a position of trust and confidence with [APT]; and VWR falsely and misleadingly advertised its products to *430[APT’s] customers.” SAC ¶ 7. APT manufactures…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Mayer v. BelichickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Morse v. Lower Merion School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. SandhuDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Advanced Fluid Systems, Inc. v. HuberDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. NealeyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Heraeus Medical GmbH v. Esschem, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.