Heraeus Medical GmbH v. Esschem, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Rufe, District Judge.
Before the Court is Plaintiff Heraeus Medical GmbH’s Motion to Continue Deadlines and Amend the Complaint.1 For the reasons that follow, the motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Because the background of the case is well known to the parties, the Court repeats a brief summary from a prior Order in this case:
Heraeus Medical GmbH is a German company specializing in the development and production of bone cements used in joint replacement surgery. Non-party Biomet, *217Inc. was, at one time, a distributor of Heraeus’s bone cement Palacos. When the distribution…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Curtis Long v. Harry Wilson, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Tai Kwan Cureton v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- ATTIAS v. 532 BROOKLYN, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Boykin v. Home Choice of Alabama, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2019
- Brooks v. State College Area School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Buckley v. Universal Sewing Supply, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- DEARDORFF v. CELLULAR SALES OF KNOXVILLE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.