Legal Opinion
Herbert S. Adair v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 1, 1994No. 93-55520Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
39 F.3d 1186
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Herbert S. ADAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-55520.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 7, 1994.*
Decided Nov. 1, 1994.
1
Before: FLETCHER, BOOCHEVER, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges
2
MEMORANDUM**
3
Plaintiff Herbert Adair appeals from the judgment for defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Consolidated Data Terminals, a California Corporation, and Cross-Appellant v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., a Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- James Barnett and Irene Barnett v. Sea Land Service, Inc., Owner of the M/v GalvestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Paul Cole, Administrator of the Estate of Boyd Byron Cole v. Layrite Products Company, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Mathis v. MorrisseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.