Legal Opinion

Old Guard Insurance v. Houck

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 2002PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBender, J.

¶ 1 Alma Houck (Appellant 1 ) appeals from the order granting Old Guard Insurance Company’s (Old Guard) motion for judgment on the pleadings in Old Guard’s declaratory judgment action against Appellant, an insured under an Old Guard automobile insurance policy. Appellant claims that the trial court erred in deter mining that she was not entitled to under-insured motorist (UIM) benefits under the Old Guard policy. For the following reasons, we affirm.

¶ 2 The facts of this case are as follows:

On or about September 26, 1999, David Houck was operating a 1980 Suzuki motorcycle with his wife, Alma…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Windrim v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance Exchange v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Rudloff v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Estate of Demutis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Seiler v. American International InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API