Legal Opinion
Grace v. Vaught
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 7, 1925No. 14956PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtH Arbi Son, J.
This is a proceeding to reverse an award made by the State! Industrial Commission in favor of Chas. P. Vaught and against Oscar Grace for injuries sustained by Vaught, while working for Grace in Grace's dry cleaning establishment.
Hour propositions are presented here for reversal of the finding and order of the commission, to wit:(1) “That respondent below, Grace, did not employ more than two workmen in his dry cleaning establishment; the injury having been sustained while section 7285, Comp. St. 1921, was in force, such section being in substance that ‘The Workmen’s Compensation Act shall not…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Producers' Lumber Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Scruggs Bros. & Bill Garage v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Graver Corporation v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Turner v. Earl W. Baker & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Republic Supply Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Swift & Co. v. WaldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.