Legal Opinion

Kesler-Ferguson v. Hy-Vee, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 16, 2008No. SC 89315PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZEL M. FISCHER, Judge.

Hy-Vee, Inc., appeals the circuit court’s judgment following a jury verdict awarding $212,400 to Doris Kesler-Ferguson (“Kesler”) on her claims for negligence and premise liability against Hy-Vee. On appeal, Hy-Vee claims that the circuit court erred in sustaining Kesler’s challenge under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), to Hy- Vee’s use of a peremptory strike against an African-American venireperson. This Court now considers whether the circuit court erred in sustaining Kesler’s Batson challenge.

Facts

This appeal originates out of a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BatemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. State v. LeticaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  4. Joe Frazier v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. JacksonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API