Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Liberty Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1929No. 28,901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one to recover on an accident insurance policy for' the death of plaintiff’s husband. Plaintiff prevailed, and the defendant appeals.

The facts were substantially these: Plaintiff’s husband held an accident policy in the defendant company in which the plaintiff was named beneficiary. The policy provided for payment if the insured *235was killed while operating, driving, riding in or on, demonstrating, adjusting or cranking an automobile, or in consequence of being struck, run down or over; or death caused by the burning or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Preferred Accident Insurance v. FieldingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  2. Trousdale v. AmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Sears v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Witt v. Spot Cash InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Braly v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Evans v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Broyles v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Milliken v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. Van Riper v. Constitutional Government LeagueWashington Supreme Court · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API